Stephen Freeman It has long seemed to me that it is one thing to believe that God exists and quite another to believe that He is good. Indeed, to believe that God exists simply begs the question.
Share2 Shares Religious topics abound on Listverse and they are frequently the most commented upon.
It has been some time since the last one so it seems like the time is ripe for another — and this one is a great one for discussion. Here we present five arguments in favor of the existence of God, and the counterargument for it.
Feel free to comment on the veracity or your opinion of each but remember to keep calm and argue reasonably. After all, it is our ability to be reasonable rationality which separates us from the other animals! These all deal with the Judeo-Christian God. Anselm, Archbishop of Canterbury, then taken up by Alvin Plantinga.
If you believe he is necessary, then you must believe he exists. It is also criticized as a circular argument, revolving from a premise to a conclusion which relies on the premise, which relies on the conclusion.
An aspect of morality is observed.
Belief in God is a better explanation for this morality than any alternative. Belief in God is thus preferable to disbelief in God.
This argument is technically valid, provided that the three constituents are accepted, and most critics refuse to accept the first. Morality, they argue, is not universal. Murder was perfectly fine for the soldiers of the First Crusade, who slaughtered every man, woman, and child in Jerusalem in Thomas Hobbes argued that morality is based on the society around it, and is thus not objective.
The fourth proof originates from the degrees discovered in things. For there is discovered greater and lesser degrees of goodness, truth, nobility, and others. For those things which are the greatest truths are the greatest beings, as is stated in Metaphysics Bk. Furthermore, that which is the greatest in its way, is, in another way, the cause of all things belonging to it; thus fire, which is the greatest heat, is the cause of all heat, as is said in the same book cf.
Question: "Is there an argument for the existence of God?" Answer: The question of whether there is a conclusive argument for the existence of God has been debated throughout history, with exceedingly intelligent people taking both sides of the dispute. In recent times, arguments against the possibility of God’s existence have taken on a . Hello, Many of us simply deny the existence of god bcoz there is no evidence before them, I read the opinions of those who deny his existence and they are saying that if god would have been there, he wouldn't have given pain to the people. A personal god is a deity who can be related to as a person instead of as an impersonal force, such as the Absolute, "the All", or the "Ground of Being".. In the scriptures of the Abrahamic religions, God is described as being a personal creator, speaking in the first person and showing emotion such as anger and pride, and sometimes appearing in anthropomorphic shape.
Therefore, there exists something that is the cause of the existence of all things, and of goodness, and of every perfection whatever. The most prevalent criticism of this argument considers that we do not have to believe in an object of a greater degree in order to believe in an object of a lesser degree.
It begins as an argument from design, and then continues into something new. In that case, nobody designed my brain for the purpose of thinking. It is merely that when the atoms inside my skull happen, for physical or chemical reasons, to arrange themselves in a certain way, this gives me, as a by-product, the sensation I call thought.
But, if so, how can I trust my own thinking to be true? Unless I believe in God, I cannot believe in thought: It sounds powerful, and the final judgment on it is still out there. But in order to reject the assumption that human minds can assess the truth or falsehood of a claim, a human mind must assume that this claim is true or false, which immediately proves that human minds can assess the truth or falsehood of a claim.In monotheistic thought, God is conceived of as the supreme being, creator deity, and principal object of faith.
The concept of God, as described by theologians, commonly includes the attributes of omniscience (all-knowing), omnipotence (all-powerful), omnipresence (all-present), and as having an eternal and necessary existence. Depending on one’s kind of theism, these attributes are used.
A personal god is a deity who can be related to as a person instead of as an impersonal force, such as the Absolute, "the All", or the "Ground of Being"..
In the scriptures of the Abrahamic religions, God is described as being a personal creator, speaking in the first person and showing emotion such as anger and pride, and sometimes appearing in anthropomorphic shape.
Apr 18, · Here we present five arguments in favor of the existence of God, and the counterargument for it. Feel free to comment on the veracity (or your opinion of) each but remember to keep calm and argue reasonably. Let us retain our personal opinion about the existence of God, no need to change it now.
But wherever possible agree with general social min-set. Because it is based only . Any attempt to make the existence of an All-knowing, All-powerful and All-good or omnibenevolent God consistent with the existence of evil is known as a Theodicy.
True The free-will defense is a theodicy which attempts to explain the existence of natural evil in the context of human freedom. Religious topics abound on Listverse and they are frequently the most commented upon.
It has been some time since the last one so it seems like the time is ripe .